CBFC clears Dhadak 2 after 16 cuts, together with altered anti-caste references-OxBig News Network

Scenes that includes caste-based discrimination like slurs and violence within the movie Dhadak 2 had been eliminated or modified by the Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), clearing the way in which for the movie’s launch months after its unique launch date. The title, starring Triptii Dimri and Siddhant Chaturvedi is a remake of the Tamil anti-caste movie Pariyerum Perumal, which was launched in 2018 with 4 cuts, in comparison with the sixteen modifications Dhadak 2 has needed to bear. The Hindu reviewed the certificates issued to each movies.

Also Read | ‘Santosh’, U.K.’s official Oscar entry, blocked by CBFC for Indian theatrical release

The movie has been rated ‘U/A 16+’, the second highest maturity classification beneath ‘A’. The movie was initially speculated to launch in November 2024, however its launch was later postponed to March, a date it additionally missed.

One dialogue in Hindi — “3,000 years of backlog will not be cleared in just 70 years.” — was modified to, “The backlog of age-old discrimination will not be cleared in just 70 years.” A dialogue that includes what seems to be a reference to an analogy by the Bahujan Samaj Party’s founder Kanshi Ram was reworked.

That analogy attracts a parallel between the nib of a pen (representing higher castes) and the remainder of it. Ram would continuously carry this analogy as much as advocate for a change within the social order. The dialogue within the movie, “Nilesh ye kalam dekh rahe ho…., Raaj kar rahe hain” (the CBFC didn’t reproduce the complete dialogue, which interprets to, “Nilesh [the protagonist], you see this pen … [they] are ruling.”), was changed with, “Yeh chota sa dhakkan puri qalam ka thoda sa hissa hai aur baki ke hai hum phir bhi hamare sir per baithe hua hai kyu.” 

The new dialogue interprets to: “This small lid is a small part of the whole pen, but it sits on our heads. Why?” A 5 second shot of somebody urinating on Nilesh was censored. The use of caste names as slurs — particularly “chamar” and “bhangi” — have been muted and changed with “junglee,” respectively. 

One of the cuts says that the “Blue colour of the dog was removed”. The unique movie encompasses a mystical sequence the place a brutally killed canine’s blue-coloured spirit rescues the protagonist. In one other scene, sixteen seconds of a 3 minute scene that includes the “humiliation of Nilesh’s father” was reduce. A line saying, “Dharam ka kaam hai,” (“this is religious work”), was changed with “Punya ka kaam hai” (“this is [work toward] a good deed”). 

One description of a reduce signifies a alternative involving the poem Thakur ka Kuan (the Thakur’s nicely), written by Om Prakash Valmiki. It is unclear if this poem was changed, or if this poem changed a unique one. Broadly, the poem explores higher caste management of sources, and decrease caste alienation from them. Rajya Sabha Member of Parliament Manoj Jha learn the poem in Parliament in 2023. 

One extra dialogue, reproduced solely partially by the CBFC as “Savarnon ke sadak … humein jala dete the.” (“The savarana’s street(s) … they would burn us [alive]”), was changed with “Na Sadke hamari thin a zameen hamari thin a paani hamar tha yaha tak ki zindagi bhi hamari nahi thi marne ki naubat aayi to shaher aagaya,” translating to “Neither were the streets ours, nor was the land, nor the water, nor even the life; I was on the verge of death, so I came to the city.”

A 20 second disclaimer earlier than the movie was changed with a one minute 51 second model, learn out loud. The CBFC didn’t listing the content material of both the unique disclaimer or the brand new one. One occasion of a swear phrase was muted, and a scene that includes violence in opposition to a lady was changed with a “black screen”. 

In one music, a doha by Tulsidas was changed. The doha is translated by the writer Ajai Kumar Chhawchharia as, “On the banks of a river in Chitrakoot, there is a crowd of saints and holy people. Tulsidas is rubbing sandalwood to make a paste, and Raghubir (Lord Ram) uses this paste to make the mark of the Tilak on their foreheads.”

The alternative is a couplet which roughly interprets to, “Shoot arrows that may seem small but inflict great damage when they hit.” The couplet resembles a verse describing the seventeenth century poet Bihari’s work, however its first line is totally different.